[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsdkikRi2wgBlODX@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:17:14 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Rick P. Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>,
Ross Burton <ross.burton@....com>,
Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@....com>,
Wilco Dijkstra <wilco.dijkstra@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 21/39] arm64/gcs: Ensure that new threads have a GCS
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 02:15:24AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> @@ -512,10 +538,16 @@ static void gcs_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
> gcs_set_el0_mode(next);
>
> /*
> - * Ensure that GCS changes are observable by/from other PEs in
> - * case of migration.
> + * Ensure that GCS memory effects of the 'prev' thread are
> + * ordered before other memory accesses with release semantics
> + * (or preceded by a DMB) on the current PE. In addition, any
> + * memory accesses with acquire semantics (or succeeded by a
> + * DMB) are ordered before GCS memory effects of the 'next'
> + * thread. This will ensure that the GCS memory effects are
> + * visible to other PEs in case of migration.
> */
> - gcsb_dsync();
> + if (task_gcs_el0_enabled(current) || task_gcs_el0_enabled(next))
> + gcsb_dsync();
> }
Ah, the comment turned up in this patch. It looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists