linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 01/25] ext4: refactor ext4_ext_rm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240822023545.1994557-2-libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:35:21 +0800
From: libaokun@...weicloud.com
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@....edu,
	adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	jack@...e.cz,
	ritesh.list@...il.com,
	ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	yi.zhang@...wei.com,
	yangerkun@...wei.com,
	libaokun@...weicloud.com,
	Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/25] ext4: refactor ext4_ext_rm_idx() to index 'path'

From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>

As suggested by Honza in Link，modify ext4_ext_rm_idx() to leave 'path'
alone and just index it like ext4_ext_correct_indexes() does it. This
facilitates adding error handling later. No functional changes.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230216130305.nrbtd42tppxhbynn@quack3/
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index e067f2dd0335..bff3666c891a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -2279,27 +2279,26 @@ static int ext4_ext_rm_idx(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 {
 	int err;
 	ext4_fsblk_t leaf;
+	int k = depth - 1;
 
 	/* free index block */
-	depth--;
-	path = path + depth;
-	leaf = ext4_idx_pblock(path->p_idx);
-	if (unlikely(path->p_hdr->eh_entries == 0)) {
-		EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "path->p_hdr->eh_entries == 0");
+	leaf = ext4_idx_pblock(path[k].p_idx);
+	if (unlikely(path[k].p_hdr->eh_entries == 0)) {
+		EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "path[%d].p_hdr->eh_entries == 0", k);
 		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
 	}
-	err = ext4_ext_get_access(handle, inode, path);
+	err = ext4_ext_get_access(handle, inode, path + k);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if (path->p_idx != EXT_LAST_INDEX(path->p_hdr)) {
-		int len = EXT_LAST_INDEX(path->p_hdr) - path->p_idx;
+	if (path[k].p_idx != EXT_LAST_INDEX(path[k].p_hdr)) {
+		int len = EXT_LAST_INDEX(path[k].p_hdr) - path[k].p_idx;
 		len *= sizeof(struct ext4_extent_idx);
-		memmove(path->p_idx, path->p_idx + 1, len);
+		memmove(path[k].p_idx, path[k].p_idx + 1, len);
 	}
 
-	le16_add_cpu(&path->p_hdr->eh_entries, -1);
-	err = ext4_ext_dirty(handle, inode, path);
+	le16_add_cpu(&path[k].p_hdr->eh_entries, -1);
+	err = ext4_ext_dirty(handle, inode, path + k);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 	ext_debug(inode, "index is empty, remove it, free block %llu\n", leaf);
@@ -2308,15 +2307,14 @@ static int ext4_ext_rm_idx(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 	ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, NULL, leaf, 1,
 			 EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_METADATA | EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET);
 
-	while (--depth >= 0) {
-		if (path->p_idx != EXT_FIRST_INDEX(path->p_hdr))
+	while (--k >= 0) {
+		if (path[k + 1].p_idx != EXT_FIRST_INDEX(path[k + 1].p_hdr))
 			break;
-		path--;
-		err = ext4_ext_get_access(handle, inode, path);
+		err = ext4_ext_get_access(handle, inode, path + k);
 		if (err)
 			break;
-		path->p_idx->ei_block = (path+1)->p_idx->ei_block;
-		err = ext4_ext_dirty(handle, inode, path);
+		path[k].p_idx->ei_block = path[k + 1].p_idx->ei_block;
+		err = ext4_ext_dirty(handle, inode, path + k);
 		if (err)
 			break;
 	}
-- 
2.39.2