[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240822181109.2577354-1-aha310510@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 03:11:09 +0900
From: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
To: wei.liu@...nel.org,
paul@....org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net/xen-netback: prevent UAF in xenvif_flush_hash()
During the list_for_each_entry_rcu iteration call of xenvif_flush_hash,
kfree_rcu does not exist inside the rcu read critical section, so if
kfree_rcu is called when the rcu grace period ends during the iteration,
UAF occurs when accessing head->next after the entry becomes free.
Therefore, to solve this, you need to change it to list_for_each_entry_safe.
Fixes: f3265971ded9 ("net: xen-netback: hash.c: Use built-in RCU list checking")
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
index ff96f22648ef..45ddce35f6d2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static u32 xenvif_new_hash(struct xenvif *vif, const u8 *data,
static void xenvif_flush_hash(struct xenvif *vif)
{
- struct xenvif_hash_cache_entry *entry;
+ struct xenvif_hash_cache_entry *entry, *n;
unsigned long flags;
if (xenvif_hash_cache_size == 0)
@@ -103,8 +103,7 @@ static void xenvif_flush_hash(struct xenvif *vif)
spin_lock_irqsave(&vif->hash.cache.lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link,
- lockdep_is_held(&vif->hash.cache.lock)) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, n, &vif->hash.cache.list, link) {
list_del_rcu(&entry->link);
vif->hash.cache.count--;
kfree_rcu(entry, rcu);
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists