[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsesYqVivEAToPUI@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:23:46 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hare@...e.de, gost.dev@...sung.com,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de, david@...morbit.com,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, yang@...amperecomputing.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
willy@...radead.org, john.g.garry@...cle.com,
cl@...amperecomputing.com, p.raghav@...sung.com,
ryan.roberts@....com, mcgrof@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/10] enable bs > ps in XFS
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
>
> This is the 13th version of the series that enables block size > page size
> (Large Block Size) experimental support in XFS. Please consider this for
> the inclusion in 6.12.
Christian, Andrew,
we believe this is ready for integration, and at the last XFS BoF we
were wondering what tree this should go through. I see fs-next is
actually just a branch on linux-next with the merge of a few select
trees [0], but this touches mm, so its not clear what tree would be be
most appropriate to consider.
Please let us know what you think, it would be great to get this into
fs-next somehow to get more exposure / testing.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240528091629.3b8de7e0@canb.auug.org.au/
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists