linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: cs-amp-lib: Ignore empty UEFI calibration entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <172436666378.825985.17736194460900053230.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 23:44:23 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: cs-amp-lib: Ignore empty UEFI calibration
 entries

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:35:44 +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> If the timestamp of a calibration entry is 0 it is an unused entry and
> must be ignored.
> 
> Some end-products reserve EFI space for calibration entries by shipping
> with a zero-filled EFI file. When searching the file for calibration
> data the driver must skip the empty entries. The timestamp of a valid
> entry is always non-zero.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: cs-amp-lib: Ignore empty UEFI calibration entries
      commit: bb4485562f5907708f1c218b5d70dce04165d1e1

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark