[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240822224547.385095-7-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:45:43 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <quic_kdybcio@...cinc.com>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@...cinc.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@...nel.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/10] OPP: Drop redundant code in _link_required_opps()
Due to that the required-devs for the required OPPs are now always being
assigned during the attach process in genpd, we no longer need the special
treatment in _link_required_opps() for the single PM domain case. Let's
therefore drop it.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
---
Changes in v3:
- None.
---
drivers/opp/of.c | 39 +++------------------------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c
index 55c8cfef97d4..fd5ed2858258 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/of.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/of.c
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ void _of_clear_opp(struct opp_table *opp_table, struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
of_node_put(opp->np);
}
-static int _link_required_opps(struct dev_pm_opp *opp, struct opp_table *opp_table,
+static int _link_required_opps(struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
struct opp_table *required_table, int index)
{
struct device_node *np;
@@ -313,39 +313,6 @@ static int _link_required_opps(struct dev_pm_opp *opp, struct opp_table *opp_tab
return -ENODEV;
}
- /*
- * There are two genpd (as required-opp) cases that we need to handle,
- * devices with a single genpd and ones with multiple genpds.
- *
- * The single genpd case requires special handling as we need to use the
- * same `dev` structure (instead of a virtual one provided by genpd
- * core) for setting the performance state.
- *
- * It doesn't make sense for a device's DT entry to have both
- * "opp-level" and single "required-opps" entry pointing to a genpd's
- * OPP, as that would make the OPP core call
- * dev_pm_domain_set_performance_state() for two different values for
- * the same device structure. Lets treat single genpd configuration as a
- * case where the OPP's level is directly available without required-opp
- * link in the DT.
- *
- * Just update the `level` with the right value, which
- * dev_pm_opp_set_opp() will take care of in the normal path itself.
- *
- * There is another case though, where a genpd's OPP table has
- * required-opps set to a parent genpd. The OPP core expects the user to
- * set the respective required `struct device` pointer via
- * dev_pm_opp_set_config().
- */
- if (required_table->is_genpd && opp_table->required_opp_count == 1 &&
- !opp_table->required_devs[0]) {
- /* Genpd core takes care of propagation to parent genpd */
- if (!opp_table->is_genpd) {
- if (!WARN_ON(opp->level != OPP_LEVEL_UNSET))
- opp->level = opp->required_opps[0]->level;
- }
- }
-
return 0;
}
@@ -370,7 +337,7 @@ static int _of_opp_alloc_required_opps(struct opp_table *opp_table,
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(required_table))
continue;
- ret = _link_required_opps(opp, opp_table, required_table, i);
+ ret = _link_required_opps(opp, required_table, i);
if (ret)
goto free_required_opps;
}
@@ -391,7 +358,7 @@ static int lazy_link_required_opps(struct opp_table *opp_table,
int ret;
list_for_each_entry(opp, &opp_table->opp_list, node) {
- ret = _link_required_opps(opp, opp_table, new_table, index);
+ ret = _link_required_opps(opp, new_table, index);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists