[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zsbi2xcxBGE7o9uE@eichest-laptop>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:03:55 +0200
From: Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@...il.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: o.rempel@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, Frank.Li@....com,
francesco.dolcini@...adex.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] i2c: imx: only poll for bus busy in multi master
mode
Hi Andi,
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:21:30AM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> > @@ -1468,6 +1473,8 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > goto rpm_disable;
> > }
> >
> > + i2c_imx->multi_master = of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "multi-master");
> > +
>
> you might also want to add the multi-master boolean property in
> the binding.
We discussed this internally and weren't sure when it was required
because e.g. i2c-rcar and i2c-tegra don't have it documented in their
bindings. Is it still required if it is part of the dt-schema?
https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/dtschema/schemas/i2c/i2c-controller.yaml
If so, I will add it in the next version.
Thanks,
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists