[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024082212-copper-oversight-f84f@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:59:33 +0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Selvarasu Ganesan <selvarasu.g@...sung.com>
Cc: Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jh0801.jung@...sung.com,
dh10.jung@...sung.com, naushad@...sung.com, akash.m5@...sung.com,
rc93.raju@...sung.com, taehyun.cho@...sung.com,
hongpooh.kim@...sung.com, eomji.oh@...sung.com,
shijie.cai@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: dwc3: core: Prevent USB core invalid event
buffer address access
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 07:13:53PM +0530, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote:
>
> On 8/17/2024 10:47 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 09:13:09PM +0530, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote:
> >> On 8/16/2024 3:25 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:18:31PM +0530, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote:
> >>>> This commit addresses an issue where the USB core could access an
> >>>> invalid event buffer address during runtime suspend, potentially causing
> >>>> SMMU faults and other memory issues in Exynos platforms. The problem
> >>>> arises from the following sequence.
> >>>> 1. In dwc3_gadget_suspend, there is a chance of a timeout when
> >>>> moving the USB core to the halt state after clearing the
> >>>> run/stop bit by software.
> >>>> 2. In dwc3_core_exit, the event buffer is cleared regardless of
> >>>> the USB core's status, which may lead to an SMMU faults and
> >>>> other memory issues. if the USB core tries to access the event
> >>>> buffer address.
> >>>>
> >>>> To prevent this hardware quirk on Exynos platforms, this commit ensures
> >>>> that the event buffer address is not cleared by software when the USB
> >>>> core is active during runtime suspend by checking its status before
> >>>> clearing the buffer address.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v6.1+
> >>> Any hint as to what commit id this fixes?
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> greg k-h
> >>
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> This issue is not related to any particular commit. The given fix is
> >> address a hardware quirk on the Exynos platform. And we require it to be
> >> backported on stable kernel 6.1 and above all stable kernel.
> > If it's a hardware quirk issue, why are you restricting it to a specific
> > kernel release and not a specific kernel commit? Why not 5.15? 5.4?
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> I mentioned a specific kernel because our platform is set to be tested
> and functioning with kernels 6.1 and above, and the issue was reported
> with these kernel versions. However, we would be fine if all stable
> kernels, such as 5.4 and 5.15, were backported. In this case, if you
> need a new patch version to update the Cc tag for all stable kernels,
> please suggest the Cc tag to avoid confusion in next version.
I'll fix it up when applying it, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists