| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <000000000000ae63710620417f67@google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 01:32:27 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+c679f13773f295d2da53@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: amir73il@...il.com, jack@...e.cz, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, phillip@...ashfs.org.uk,
squashfs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [squashfs?] possible deadlock in fsnotify_destroy_mark
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: b311c1b497e5 Merge tag '6.11-rc4-server-fixes' of git://gi..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10351047980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=df2f0ed7e30a639d
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c679f13773f295d2da53
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1247776b980000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=121bb693980000
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-b311c1b4.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1c99fa48192f/vmlinux-b311c1b4.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/16d5710a012a/bzImage-b311c1b4.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d59520377407/mount_0.gz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+c679f13773f295d2da53@...kaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00019-gb311c1b497e5 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/78 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88801b8d8930 (&group->mark_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fsnotify_group_lock include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h:270 [inline]
ffff88801b8d8930 (&group->mark_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fsnotify_destroy_mark+0x38/0x3c0 fs/notify/mark.c:578
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8ea2fd60 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6841 [inline]
ffffffff8ea2fd60 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbb4/0x35a0 mm/vmscan.c:7223
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3818 [inline]
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x140 mm/page_alloc.c:3832
might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3939 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4017 [inline]
kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x3d/0x2a0 mm/slub.c:4044
inotify_new_watch fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:599 [inline]
inotify_update_watch fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:647 [inline]
__do_sys_inotify_add_watch fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:786 [inline]
__se_sys_inotify_add_watch+0x72e/0x1070 fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:729
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (&group->mark_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
fsnotify_group_lock include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h:270 [inline]
fsnotify_destroy_mark+0x38/0x3c0 fs/notify/mark.c:578
fsnotify_destroy_marks+0x14a/0x660 fs/notify/mark.c:934
fsnotify_inoderemove include/linux/fsnotify.h:264 [inline]
dentry_unlink_inode+0x2e0/0x430 fs/dcache.c:403
__dentry_kill+0x20d/0x630 fs/dcache.c:610
shrink_kill+0xa9/0x2c0 fs/dcache.c:1055
shrink_dentry_list+0x2c0/0x5b0 fs/dcache.c:1082
prune_dcache_sb+0x10f/0x180 fs/dcache.c:1163
super_cache_scan+0x34f/0x4b0 fs/super.c:221
do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4815
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4876 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4954 [inline]
shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5934
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6762 [inline]
balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6954 [inline]
kswapd+0x1bcd/0x35a0 mm/vmscan.c:7223
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&group->mark_mutex);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&group->mark_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kswapd0/78:
#0: ffffffff8ea2fd60 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6841 [inline]
#0: ffffffff8ea2fd60 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbb4/0x35a0 mm/vmscan.c:7223
#1: ffff8880385580e0 (&type->s_umount_key#44){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:562 [inline]
#1: ffff8880385580e0 (&type->s_umount_key#44){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x94/0x4b0 fs/super.c:196
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 78 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00019-gb311c1b497e5 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2186
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
fsnotify_group_lock include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h:270 [inline]
fsnotify_destroy_mark+0x38/0x3c0 fs/notify/mark.c:578
fsnotify_destroy_marks+0x14a/0x660 fs/notify/mark.c:934
fsnotify_inoderemove include/linux/fsnotify.h:264 [inline]
dentry_unlink_inode+0x2e0/0x430 fs/dcache.c:403
__dentry_kill+0x20d/0x630 fs/dcache.c:610
shrink_kill+0xa9/0x2c0 fs/dcache.c:1055
shrink_dentry_list+0x2c0/0x5b0 fs/dcache.c:1082
prune_dcache_sb+0x10f/0x180 fs/dcache.c:1163
super_cache_scan+0x34f/0x4b0 fs/super.c:221
do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4815
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4876 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4954 [inline]
shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5934
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6762 [inline]
balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6954 [inline]
kswapd+0x1bcd/0x35a0 mm/vmscan.c:7223
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists