linux-kernel - [PATCH v11 23/39] arm64/mm: Implement map_shadow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240822-arm64-gcs-v11-23-41b81947ecb5@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 02:15:26 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, 
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, 
 Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, 
 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, 
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
 "Rick P. Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, 
 Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, 
 Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, 
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, 
 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, 
 Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, 
 Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>, 
 Ross Burton <ross.burton@....com>, 
 Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@....com>, 
 Wilco Dijkstra <wilco.dijkstra@....com>, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
 kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v11 23/39] arm64/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack()

As discussed extensively in the changelog for the addition of this
syscall on x86 ("x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall") the
existing mmap() and madvise() syscalls do not map entirely well onto the
security requirements for guarded control stacks since they lead to
windows where memory is allocated but not yet protected or stacks which
are not properly and safely initialised. Instead a new syscall
map_shadow_stack() has been defined which allocates and initialises a
shadow stack page.

Implement this for arm64.  Two flags are provided, allowing applications
to request that the stack be initialised with a valid cap token at the
top of the stack and optionally also an end of stack marker above that.
We support requesting an end of stack marker alone but since this is a
NULL pointer it is indistinguishable from not initialising anything by
itself.

Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c b/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
index 5eb746fdd872..d9614900c910 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/gcs.c
@@ -67,6 +67,70 @@ unsigned long gcs_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk,
 	return addr;
 }

+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsigned int, flags)
+{
+	unsigned long alloc_size;
+	unsigned long __user *cap_ptr;
+	unsigned long cap_val;
+	int ret = 0;
+	int cap_offset;
+
+	if (!system_supports_gcs())
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (flags & ~(SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN | SHADOW_STACK_SET_MARKER))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (size == 8 || !IS_ALIGNED(size, 8))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * An overflow would result in attempting to write the restore token
+	 * to the wrong location. Not catastrophic, but just return the right
+	 * error code and block it.
+	 */
+	alloc_size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
+	if (alloc_size < size)
+		return -EOVERFLOW;
+
+	addr = alloc_gcs(addr, alloc_size);
+	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
+		return addr;
+
+	/*
+	 * Put a cap token at the end of the allocated region so it
+	 * can be switched to.
+	 */
+	if (flags & SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN) {
+		/* Leave an extra empty frame as a top of stack marker? */
+		if (flags & SHADOW_STACK_SET_MARKER)
+			cap_offset = 2;
+		else
+			cap_offset = 1;
+
+		cap_ptr = (unsigned long __user *)(addr + size -
+						   (cap_offset * sizeof(unsigned long)));
+		cap_val = GCS_CAP(cap_ptr);
+
+		put_user_gcs(cap_val, cap_ptr, &ret);
+		if (ret != 0) {
+			vm_munmap(addr, size);
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Ensure the new cap is ordered before standard
+		 * memory accesses to the same location.
+		 */
+		gcsb_dsync();
+	}
+
+	return addr;
+}
+
 /*
  * Apply the GCS mode configured for the specified task to the
  * hardware.

-- 
2.39.2