lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALu+AoR3=a6suS0KyC7HJBOca8zBA0Y2AteF4=b=21j=pVKm1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 20:04:58 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@...rr.cc>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <piliu@...hat.com>, Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>, 
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Philipp Rudo <prudo@...hat.com>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, 
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, 
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 0/9] UEFI emulator for kexec

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 at 18:56, Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@...rr.cc> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> > I forgot why we can not just extract the kernel from UKI and then load
> > it directly,  if the embedded kernel is also signed it should be good?
>
> The problem is that in the basic usecase for UKI you only sign the entire
> UKI PE file and not the included kernel, because you only want that kernel
> to be run with that one initrd and that one kernel cmdline.

Hmm,  as replied to Pinfan I thought that both the included kernel and
UKI can be signed, and for kdump case kexec_file_load can be used
simply.

>
> So at a minimum you have to have the signature on the whole UKI checked by
> the kernel and than have the kernel extract UKI into its parts unless you
> somehow want to extent trust into userspace to have a helper program do that.

extend trust into userspace is hard, previously when Vivek created the
kexec_file_load this has been explored and he gave up this option. :(

Pingfan,  nice to see you have something done as POC at least, and
good to see this topic is live. I just have some worries about the
complexity of the emulator though.

Thanks
Dave


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ