linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] Revert "spi: ppc4xx: handle irq_of_parse_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZsimQuIJuNNIqn09@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 18:09:54 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] Revert "spi: ppc4xx: handle
 irq_of_parse_and_map() errors"

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 06:11:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 07:44:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 12:20:30PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> > > subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
> > > Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and
> > > make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
> > > There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.
> 
> > This is a pure and clean revert, not sure if we need to hide that fact.
> 
> This is not an issue with the word "revert", it is an issue with the
> formatting of the subject line.

So, should I send a v2?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko