linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] perf trace: Add a new argument to trace__btf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH0uvoia0ewN+KomxwUEYDvsLyLXCO4_0+jzCc=HZkB_Sz1+OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 12:05:11 +0800
From: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, irogers@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, 
	kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, namhyung@...nel.org, 
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] perf trace: Add a new argument to trace__btf_scnprintf()

Hello,

On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 2:13 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 03:00:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 09:36:21AM +0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> > > Pass the struct syscall_arg, so that we can use the augmented_arg later
> > > in the struct augmentation.
> >
> > Breaks the build with:
> >
> > builtin-trace.c: In function ‘trace__btf_scnprintf’:
> > builtin-trace.c:1011:78: error: unused parameter ‘arg’ [-Werror=unused-parameter]
> >  1011 |                                    size_t size, int val, struct syscall_arg *arg, char *type)
> >       |                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
> >   LD      /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/perf-util-in.o
> >   LD      /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/perf-util-in.o
> >   AR      /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/libperf-util.a
> >   GEN     /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/python/perf.cpython-312-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > So we either use __maybe_unused at this point or combine it with the
> > patch where it really gets used. I think the later is better, will do.
>
> So here what I think we should do is to use the patch below, ok? I'm
> continuing...
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> ---
>
> From 2c1ea68ac3d18109d96bd16e2860e076d2e0d61e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:10:27 -0300
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] perf trace: Pass the richer 'struct syscall_arg' pointer
>  to trace__btf_scnprintf()
>
> Since we'll need it later in the current patch series and we can get the
> syscall_arg_fmt from syscall_arg->fmt.
>
> Based-on-a-patch-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zsd8vqCrTh5h69rp@x1
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> index 37ca96e130a5862d..a909880bd25e51d1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> @@ -1007,9 +1007,11 @@ static size_t btf_enum_scnprintf(const struct btf_type *type, struct btf *btf, c
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static size_t trace__btf_scnprintf(struct trace *trace, struct syscall_arg_fmt *arg_fmt, char *bf,
> +static size_t trace__btf_scnprintf(struct trace *trace, struct syscall_arg *arg, char *bf,
>                                    size_t size, int val, char *type)
>  {
> +       struct syscall_arg_fmt *arg_fmt = arg->fmt;
> +
>         if (trace->btf == NULL)
>                 return 0;
>
> @@ -1029,7 +1031,7 @@ static size_t trace__btf_scnprintf(struct trace *trace, struct syscall_arg_fmt *
>  }
>
>  #else // HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
> -static size_t trace__btf_scnprintf(struct trace *trace __maybe_unused, struct syscall_arg_fmt *arg_fmt __maybe_unused,
> +static size_t trace__btf_scnprintf(struct trace *trace __maybe_unused, struct syscall_arg *arg __maybe_unused,
>                                    char *bf __maybe_unused, size_t size __maybe_unused, int val __maybe_unused,
>                                    char *type __maybe_unused)
>  {
> @@ -2284,7 +2286,7 @@ static size_t syscall__scnprintf_args(struct syscall *sc, char *bf, size_t size,
>                         if (trace->show_arg_names)
>                                 printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, size - printed, "%s: ", field->name);
>
> -                       btf_printed = trace__btf_scnprintf(trace, &sc->arg_fmt[arg.idx], bf + printed,
> +                       btf_printed = trace__btf_scnprintf(trace, &arg, bf + printed,
>                                                            size - printed, val, field->type);
>                         if (btf_printed) {
>                                 printed += btf_printed;
> @@ -2987,7 +2989,7 @@ static size_t trace__fprintf_tp_fields(struct trace *trace, struct evsel *evsel,
>                 if (trace->show_arg_names)
>                         printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, size - printed, "%s: ", field->name);
>
> -               btf_printed = trace__btf_scnprintf(trace, arg, bf + printed, size - printed, val, field->type);
> +               btf_printed = trace__btf_scnprintf(trace, &syscall_arg, bf + printed, size - printed, val, field->type);
>                 if (btf_printed) {
>                         printed += btf_printed;
>                         continue;
> --
> 2.46.0

We pass the syscall_arg to get both format and augmented args, I think
that's the best way to do it.

LGTM, thank you.

Thanks,
Howard

>