linux-kernel - Re: A Comparison of printk between upstream and linux-rt-devel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240823071141.IJwRFmZ8@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 09:11:41 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: williams@...hat.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de,
	Derek Barbosa <debarbos@...hat.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A Comparison of printk between upstream and linux-rt-devel

On 2024-08-22 12:32:15 [-0400], Derek Barbosa wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> TLDR: plain, vanilla 6.11.0-0.rc3 is slower on flush and 
> does not print traces in panic/crash context consistently.

Petr, the whole thread is at
	https://lore.kernel.org/ZsdoD6PomBRsB-ow@debarbos-thinkpadt14sgen2i.remote.csb

your email address had a typo in it.

Sebastian