lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04c58410-13c8-4e50-a009-5715af0cded3@icloud.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:46:12 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Fix an uninitialized variable is used by
 __device_attach()

On 2024/8/23 08:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 07:46:09AM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>>
>> An uninitialized variable @data.have_async may be used as analyzed
>> by the following inline comments:
>>
>> static int __device_attach(struct device *dev, bool allow_async)
>> {
>> 	// if @allow_async is true.
>>
>> 	...
>> 	struct device_attach_data data = {
>> 		.dev = dev,
>> 		.check_async = allow_async,
>> 		.want_async = false,
>> 	};
>> 	// @data.have_async is not initialized.
> 
> No, in the presence of a structure initializer fields not explicitly
> initialized will be set to 0 by the compiler.
> 
really?
do all C compilers have such behavior ?

> There is no issue here.
> 
> Thanks.
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ