linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] PCI: Change the parent to correctly represent pcie hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACMJSeuHkbUYSSE_7=HE5L2_j4LaR_jA2XSDgg_6=WFd_GdE2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 10:31:34 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, 
	Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, 
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, andersson@...nel.org, quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] PCI: Change the parent to correctly represent pcie hierarchy

On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 at 10:30, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > Right now the commit log doesn't tell me enough to justify a
> > > > post-merge window change.
> > >
> > > Please, apply this patch independently. FYI I have a WiP branch[1]
> > > with a v3 of the fixes series rebased on top of this one. Manivannan
> > > and I are working on fixing one last remaining issue and I'll resend
> > > it. This should go into v6.11.
> >
> > OK.  I just need to be able to justify *why* we need it in v6.11, so I
> > can apply it as soon as somebody supplies that kind of text for the
> > commit log.  I.e., what is broken without this change?  What bad
> > things happen if we defer it to v6.12?
> >
>
> I'm not sure if this is a 6.11 material as this patch is not fixing any crash or
> potential breakage in 6.11. This patch changes the hierarchy in such a way that
> the suspend/resume could work fine once added in the pwrctl drivers.
>
> At the same time, I'd like to get it merged separately for 6.12 instead of
> bundling it in this same series.
>

Ok, I'll find a way to rework my patches so that this one's not needed.

Bart