linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] driver core: Fix an uninitialized variable is used by __device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZsfmR69nVPZj_8oE@google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:30:47 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Fix an uninitialized variable is used by
 __device_attach()

On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 08:46:12AM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> On 2024/8/23 08:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 07:46:09AM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> >> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
> >>
> >> An uninitialized variable @data.have_async may be used as analyzed
> >> by the following inline comments:
> >>
> >> static int __device_attach(struct device *dev, bool allow_async)
> >> {
> >> 	// if @allow_async is true.
> >>
> >> 	...
> >> 	struct device_attach_data data = {
> >> 		.dev = dev,
> >> 		.check_async = allow_async,
> >> 		.want_async = false,
> >> 	};
> >> 	// @data.have_async is not initialized.
> > 
> > No, in the presence of a structure initializer fields not explicitly
> > initialized will be set to 0 by the compiler.
> > 
> really?
> do all C compilers have such behavior ?

Yes, all conforming to the C standard.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry