[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0134870-7349-4e9d-80e1-d254873d5035@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 15:19:23 +0530
From: Gokul Sriram P <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <quic_viswanat@...cinc.com>, <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>,
<quic_varada@...cinc.com>, <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add new driver for WCSS secure PIL loading
On 8/22/2024 4:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/08/2024 12:43, Gokul Sriram P wrote:
>> On 8/20/2024 4:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 20/08/2024 10:55, Gokul Sriram Palanisamy wrote:
>>>> This series depends on q6 clock removal series [1].
>>> How? So this cannot be tested and merged?
>> Yes. Though TrustZone enables these clocks, since Linux Kernel will
>> consider these clock as unused.
>> These clock will be disabled so we cannot bring Q6 out of reset. So we
>> have the dependency set.
>> I posted this as a separate series because [1] 'remove unnecessary q6
>> clocks' series was already reviewed for some
>> versions.
> This is not a dependency in the kernel workflow. Nothing gets broken,
> nothing stops this patch from merging. Your remark is confusing and will
> either start questions or prevent applying the patchset.
>
Ok, got it. It will not break anything. Will post this series as
independent series in v2.
thanks,
Gokul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists