linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] i2c: designware: Cleanups (part 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZsiPOQ_xEXdh9b4Z@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 16:31:37 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>, Narasimhan.V@....com,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] i2c: designware: Cleanups (part 2)

On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 02:45:58AM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 08:58:36PM GMT, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > This is the subset of the patches [1] that should not affect any
> > functionality. Here are:
> > - consolidation of FW parsing and configuring code 
> > - some function renaming / dropping
> > - switching to export namespace
> > 
> > In any case this is Cc'ed to AMD who reported a problem in [1]
> > presumably in the patch that is *not* included here.
> > 
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20231207141653.2785124-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/ [1]
> > 
> > Andy Shevchenko (5):
> >   i2c: designware: Rename dw_i2c_of_configure() -> i2c_dw_of_configure()
> >   i2c: designware: Consolidate firmware parsing and configuring code
> >   i2c: designware: Unify the firmware type checks
> >   i2c: designware: Move exports to I2C_DW namespaces
> >   i2c: designware: Remove ->disable() callback
> 
> I merged these patches in i2c/i2c-host.

Thank you!

> Normally I leave patches a bit longer in the list, but they have been
> reviewed and discussed.

FWIW, there is no change done to them except rebasing to avoid that suspicious
PM patch to be included.

> If there will come some observations from others, we are in time
> to change them.

Yes, I am here to help.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko