[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef36a703-929b-2fb1-6d8b-58c17f37c964@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 10:31:19 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] spi: stm32-qspi: Simpify resource lookup
On 2024/8/22 22:58, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 08:37:07PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> Use the devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname() helper instead of
>> calling platform_get_resource_byname() and devm_ioremap_resource()
>> separately.
>
> This breaks boot on the Avenger96 board, it causes a NULL pointer
> dereference:
>
> [ 2.350480] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 when read
>
> ...
>
> [ 2.695787] Call trace:
> [ 2.695807] stm32_qspi_probe from platform_probe+0x5c/0xb0
> [ 2.703914] platform_probe from really_probe+0xc8/0x2c8
> [ 2.709284] really_probe from __driver_probe_device+0x88/0x19c
> [ 2.715145] __driver_probe_device from driver_probe_device+0x30/0x104
>
> https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/650792
>
>> - res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "qspi");
>> - qspi->io_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> + qspi->io_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "qspi");
>> if (IS_ERR(qspi->io_base))
>> return PTR_ERR(qspi->io_base);
>>
>> qspi->phys_base = res->start;
>>
>> - res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "qspi_mm");
>> - qspi->mm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> + qspi->mm_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "qspi_mm");
>> if (IS_ERR(qspi->mm_base))
>> return PTR_ERR(qspi->mm_base);
>
> I can't identify any obvious error here, these look like a direct
> subsitution - the implementation of devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname()
> looks to be the same as the replaced code and dev is set to &pdev->dev
> but I'm seeing the above behaviour.
Mark, thank you very much, I can't identify the error here too. This bug
may be easy to locate if have a reproduction environment, but it's good
to keep it the way it is.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists