linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs fixes for 6.11-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjuLtz5F12hgCb1Yp1OVr4Bbo481m-k3YhheHWJQLpA0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 10:25:02 +0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs fixes for 6.11-rc5

On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 at 10:14, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 09:23:00AM GMT, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 at 02:54, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Linus, big one this time...
> >
> > Yeah, no, enough is enough. The last pull was already big.
> >
> > This is too big, it touches non-bcachefs stuff, and it's not even
> > remotely some kind of regression.
> >
> > At some point "fix something" just turns into development, and this is
> > that point.
> >
> > Nobody sane uses bcachefs and expects it to be stable, so every single
> > user is an experimental site.
>
> Eh?
>
> Universal consensus has been that bcachefs is _definitely_ more
> trustworthy than brtfs,

I'll believe that when there are major distros that use it and you
have lots of varied use.

But it doesn't even change the issue: you aren't fixing a regression,
you are doing new development to fix some old probl;em, and now you
are literally editing non-bcachefs files too.

Enough is enough.

                   Linus