linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs fixes for 6.11-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgpb0UPYYSe6or8_NHKQD+VooTxpfgSpHwKydhm3GkS0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 10:35:38 +0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs fixes for 6.11-rc5

On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 at 10:33, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> What is to be gained by holding back fixes, if we've got every reason to
> believe that the fixes are solid?

What is to be gained by having release rules and a stable development
environment? I wonder.

            Linus