linux-kernel - Sin? (cont: Low Jitter, Philosophy, Fair Pay)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eb2ebc0c-cd59-4cfe-b87a-0232e8232b9c@moabit.uno>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 05:49:37 +0200
From: Ywe Cærlyn <ruhban@...bit.uno>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Sin? (cont: Low Jitter, Philosophy, Fair Pay)

There is some discussion on whether to use the concept Sin or not in 
electronics design.

I think the association to sinfulness is suboptimal here, and IT can 
actually be used for electronics design instead.

This unifies computer and electronics design, with fair pay background, 
something everybody wants.

IT short for The Initiator.

Read more about IT x philosophy background on https://moabit.uno/

Light.
Ywe.