lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00000000000059326f06207a4c52@google.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 21:18:19 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+4cd21de745fa06782146@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: dhowells@...hat.com, jlayton@...nel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfs@...ts.linux.dev, 
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [netfs?] possible deadlock in netfs_writepages

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    521b1e7f4cf0 Merge tag 'cxl-fixes-6.11-rc5' of git://git.k..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1319656b980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=c87b73e79a234035
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4cd21de745fa06782146
compiler:       gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
userspace arch: i386

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-521b1e7f.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/16372c2b18b5/vmlinux-521b1e7f.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/94a90e809b75/bzImage-521b1e7f.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+4cd21de745fa06782146@...kaller.appspotmail.com

fuse: Unknown parameter 'r.atmode'
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00011-g521b1e7f4cf0 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.0.1984/12860 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888028a511e0 (&ctx->wb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: netfs_writepages+0x5e1/0xdd0 fs/netfs/write_issue.c:509

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88801d5b9e18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:106 [inline]
ffff88801d5b9e18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: exit_mmap+0x1fa/0xb20 mm/mmap.c:3420

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
       down_read_killable+0x9d/0x380 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1549
       mmap_read_lock_killable include/linux/mmap_lock.h:153 [inline]
       get_mmap_lock_carefully mm/memory.c:5878 [inline]
       lock_mm_and_find_vma+0x3a9/0x6a0 mm/memory.c:5929
       do_user_addr_fault+0x2b5/0x13f0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1361
       handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1481 [inline]
       exc_page_fault+0x5c/0xc0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1539
       asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:623
       fault_in_readable+0x126/0x230 mm/gup.c:2244
       fault_in_iov_iter_readable+0x101/0x2c0 lib/iov_iter.c:94
       netfs_perform_write+0x3ef/0x2250 fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:240
       netfs_buffered_write_iter_locked+0x213/0x2c0 fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:470
       netfs_file_write_iter+0x1e0/0x470 fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:509
       v9fs_file_write_iter+0xa1/0x100 fs/9p/vfs_file.c:407
       aio_write+0x3c1/0x8e0 fs/aio.c:1633
       __io_submit_one fs/aio.c:2005 [inline]
       io_submit_one+0x124e/0x1db0 fs/aio.c:2052
       __do_compat_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:2153 [inline]
       __se_compat_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:2123 [inline]
       __ia32_compat_sys_io_submit+0x1af/0x390 fs/aio.c:2123
       do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
       __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
       do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
       entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

-> #0 (&ctx->wb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x24ed/0x3cb0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       netfs_writepages+0x5e1/0xdd0 fs/netfs/write_issue.c:509
       do_writepages+0x1a3/0x7f0 mm/page-writeback.c:2683
       filemap_fdatawrite_wbc mm/filemap.c:397 [inline]
       filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x148/0x1c0 mm/filemap.c:387
       v9fs_mmap_vm_close+0x213/0x260 fs/9p/vfs_file.c:502
       remove_vma+0x8b/0x180 mm/mmap.c:182
       exit_mmap+0x4d4/0xb20 mm/mmap.c:3436
       __mmput+0x12a/0x480 kernel/fork.c:1345
       mmput+0x62/0x70 kernel/fork.c:1367
       exit_mm kernel/exit.c:571 [inline]
       do_exit+0x9bf/0x2bb0 kernel/exit.c:869
       do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1031
       get_signal+0x265a/0x26e0 kernel/signal.c:2917
       arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x90/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:310
       exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline]
       exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
       __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
       syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218
       __do_fast_syscall_32+0x80/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:389
       do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
       entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
                               lock(&ctx->wb_lock);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
  lock(&ctx->wb_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz.0.1984/12860:
 #0: ffff88801d5b9e18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:106 [inline]
 #0: ffff88801d5b9e18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: exit_mmap+0x1fa/0xb20 mm/mmap.c:3420

stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 12860 Comm: syz.0.1984 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00011-g521b1e7f4cf0 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:119
 check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2186
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x24ed/0x3cb0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
 netfs_writepages+0x5e1/0xdd0 fs/netfs/write_issue.c:509
 do_writepages+0x1a3/0x7f0 mm/page-writeback.c:2683
 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc mm/filemap.c:397 [inline]
 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x148/0x1c0 mm/filemap.c:387
 v9fs_mmap_vm_close+0x213/0x260 fs/9p/vfs_file.c:502
 remove_vma+0x8b/0x180 mm/mmap.c:182
 exit_mmap+0x4d4/0xb20 mm/mmap.c:3436
 __mmput+0x12a/0x480 kernel/fork.c:1345
 mmput+0x62/0x70 kernel/fork.c:1367
 exit_mm kernel/exit.c:571 [inline]
 do_exit+0x9bf/0x2bb0 kernel/exit.c:869
 do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1031
 get_signal+0x265a/0x26e0 kernel/signal.c:2917
 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x90/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:310
 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline]
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
 __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218
 __do_fast_syscall_32+0x80/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:389
 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e
RIP: 0023:0xf7f31579
Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xf7f3154f.
RSP: 002b:00000000f56d660c EFLAGS: 00000296 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000f0
RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00000000f73f4f88 RCX: 0000000000000080
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000f73f4f8c
RBP: 0000000000000081 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ