[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d4ec950-878f-499c-a808-dd5b31c2ddb6@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 07:16:27 +0200
From: Marion & Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, hjc@...k-chips.com, heiko@...ech.de,
andy.yan@...k-chips.com, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
krzk@...nel.org, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/5] drm/mediatek: Fix missing of_node_put() for
mtk_drm_get_all_drm_priv()
Le 23/08/2024 à 12:46, Christophe JAILLET a écrit :
>> @@ -933,10 +931,8 @@ static int mtk_drm_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> }
>> ret = mtk_ddp_comp_init(node, &private->ddp_comp[comp_id],
>> comp_id);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - of_node_put(node);
>> + if (ret)
>> goto err_node;
>
> Hi,
>
> I've seen on another thread that is was not sure that scoped versions
> and gotos played well together.
>
> It was asked to check more in details and confirm that it was safe
> before applying the patch.
>
> I've not followed the discussion, so I just point it out, in case it helps.
>
> I'll try to give it a look in the coming days.
>
>
> CJ
>
Hi,
looking at the generated asm file (gcc 14.2.1), everything looks fine.
# drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c:933: ret =
mtk_ddp_comp_init(node, &private->ddp_comp[comp_id], comp_id);
salq $5, %rax #, _36
movl %r14d, %edx # comp_id,
movq %rbx, %rdi # node,
leaq 552(%rbp,%rax), %rsi #, _28
call mtk_ddp_comp_init #
movl %eax, %r12d # tmp205, <retval>
# drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c:934: if (ret)
testl %eax, %eax # <retval>
jne .L212 #,
...
.L212:
# ./include/linux/of.h:138: DEFINE_FREE(device_node, struct device_node
*, if (_T) of_node_put(_T))
movq %rbx, %rdi # node,
call of_node_put #
jmp .L171 #
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists