[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240826174116.5008-6-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:41:13 +0900
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] nilfs2: do not repair reserved inode bitmap in nilfs_new_inode()
After commit 93aef9eda1ce ("nilfs2: fix incorrect inode allocation
from reserved inodes") is applied, the inode number returned by
nilfs_ifile_create_inode() is guaranteed to always be greater than or
equal to NILFS_USER_INO, so if the inode number is a reserved inode
number (less than NILFS_USER_INO), the code to repair the bitmap
immediately following it is no longer executed. So, delete it.
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
---
fs/nilfs2/inode.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
index 3c4a0577bc71..3742baec4920 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
@@ -345,19 +345,6 @@ struct inode *nilfs_new_inode(struct inode *dir, umode_t mode)
if (unlikely(err))
goto failed_ifile_create_inode;
/* reference count of i_bh inherits from nilfs_mdt_read_block() */
-
- if (unlikely(ino < NILFS_USER_INO)) {
- nilfs_warn(sb,
- "inode bitmap is inconsistent for reserved inodes");
- do {
- brelse(bh);
- err = nilfs_ifile_create_inode(root->ifile, &ino, &bh);
- if (unlikely(err))
- goto failed_ifile_create_inode;
- } while (ino < NILFS_USER_INO);
-
- nilfs_info(sb, "repaired inode bitmap for reserved inodes");
- }
ii->i_bh = bh;
atomic64_inc(&root->inodes_count);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists