linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH-cgroup 0/2] cgroup/cpuset: Account for boot time isolated CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ce01caf5-e576-4614-b6b8-0206da1a7c49@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:01:21 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
 Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Koutný
 <mkoutny@...e.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-cgroup 0/2] cgroup/cpuset: Account for boot time isolated
 CPUs

On 8/20/24 15:55, Waiman Long wrote:
> The current cpuset code and test_cpuset_prs.sh test have not fully
> account for the possibility of pre-isolated CPUs added by the "isolcpus"
> boot command line parameter. This patch series modifies them to do the
> right thing whether or not "isolcpus" is present or not.
>
> The updated test_cpuset_prs.sh was run successfully with or without the
> "isolcpus" option.
>
> Waiman Long (2):
>    cgroup/cpuset: Account for boot time isolated CPUs
>    selftest/cgroup: Make test_cpuset_prs.sh deal with pre-isolated CPUs
>
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c                        | 23 +++++++---
>   .../selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh       | 44 ++++++++++++++-----
>   2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
Ping! Any comment on these patches?

Thanks,
Longman