[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1fd73a3941c54e58420d7555524cd6baeebfb96.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 07:38:53 +0200
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Dave Vasilevsky <dave@...ilevsky.ca>
Cc: bhe@...hat.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Reimar
Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crash: Default to CRASH_DUMP=n when support for it is
unlikely
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 12:02 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > What is so special about CRASH_DUMP, that it should be enabled by
> > default?
>
> The reality is that essentially all distros enable it. Because they
> don't want to manage separate kernel / crash-kernel packages.
>
> So IMHO having it enabled by default in upstream does make sense,
> because it more closely matches what distros/users actually run.
Well, at least Debian did not enable it by default as otherwise we wouldn't
have noticed this change downstream.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists