linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Implement blocking domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202408270611.sr21RBzy-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 06:38:25 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, joro@...tes.org,
	will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com,
	gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, jgg@...pe.ca, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
	hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
	svens@...ux.ibm.com, jroedel@...e.de, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Implement blocking domain

Hi Matthew,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on s390/features]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.11-rc5 next-20240826]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Matthew-Rosato/iommu-s390-Implement-blocking-domain/20240826-163744
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git features
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240823203108.304054-1-mjrosato%40linux.ibm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Implement blocking domain
config: s390-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408270611.sr21RBzy-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408270611.sr21RBzy-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408270611.sr21RBzy-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/bug.h:5,
                    from include/linux/fortify-string.h:6,
                    from include/linux/string.h:374,
                    from include/linux/uuid.h:11,
                    from include/linux/mod_devicetable.h:14,
                    from include/linux/pci.h:27,
                    from drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:9:
   drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c: In function 'zpci_get_iommu_ctrs':
>> include/linux/lockdep.h:252:61: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'spinlock_t' {aka 'struct spinlock'})
     252 | #define lockdep_is_held(lock)           lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map)
         |                                                             ^~
   arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h:54:32: note: in definition of macro 'WARN_ON'
      54 |         int __ret_warn_on = !!(x);                      \
         |                                ^
   include/linux/lockdep.h:285:9: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_assert'
     285 |         lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD)
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/lockdep.h:285:24: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_is_held'
     285 |         lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD)
         |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:707:9: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_assert_held'
     707 |         lockdep_assert_held(zdev->dom_lock);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +252 include/linux/lockdep.h

f607c668577481 Peter Zijlstra 2009-07-20  251  
f8319483f57f1c Peter Zijlstra 2016-11-30 @252  #define lockdep_is_held(lock)		lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map)
f8319483f57f1c Peter Zijlstra 2016-11-30  253  #define lockdep_is_held_type(lock, r)	lock_is_held_type(&(lock)->dep_map, (r))
f607c668577481 Peter Zijlstra 2009-07-20  254  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki