linux-kernel - [PATCH] acpi/_DSM: Add rev/func to warning message when acpi_evaluate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240826233437.19632-1-00107082@163.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 07:34:37 +0800
From: David Wang <00107082@....com>
To: rafael@...nel.org,
	lenb@...nel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Wang <00107082@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] acpi/_DSM: Add rev/func to warning message when acpi_evaluate_dsm failed.

When acpi_evaluate_dsm failed, the warning message lacks the rev
and func information which is available and helpful.
For example, iwlwifi would make _DSM queries for lari config,
and when it failed, all warning messages are all the same:
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
With this patch, the warnings would be more informative:
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:1 (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:6 (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:7 (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:8 (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:3 (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:9 (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:10 (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:12 (0x1001)

Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@....com>
---
 drivers/acpi/utils.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
index ae9384282273..6de542d99518 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
@@ -801,7 +801,8 @@ acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 func,

 	if (ret != AE_NOT_FOUND)
 		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
-				 "failed to evaluate _DSM %pUb (0x%x)\n", guid, ret);
+				 "failed to evaluate _DSM %pUb rev:%lld func:%lld (0x%x)\n",
+				 guid, rev, func, ret);

 	return NULL;
 }
-- 
2.39.2