[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5G1OsrPSwFs64-MPSQgp28=Jk7zKs1WDDjVNrmPfSd0sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:46:30 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] regulator: Move OF-specific regulator lookup
code to of_regulator.c
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 9:43 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 02:49:59PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:19:55PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * of_get_child_regulator - get a child regulator device node
> > > > + * based on supply name
> > > > + * @parent: Parent device node
> > > > + * @prop_name: Combination regulator supply name and "-supply"
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Traverse all child nodes.
> > > > + * Extract the child regulator device node corresponding to the supply name.
> > > > + * returns the device node corresponding to the regulator if found, else
> > > > + * returns NULL.
> > >
> > > At the same time you may fix kernel-doc warnings (no "Return" section) in these
> > > three (on your wish you may fix others in a separate change, but it's not
> > > related to this series).
> >
> > As you said some other functions are missing it as well, so I'll do a
> > patch separate from this series to fix them all.
>
> But you need to fix them in this patch series. We do not add patches with known
> issues, which are really easy to fix beforehand.
I'd say that's a preexisting thing, and code movement shouldn't change it.
But, yeah, I can send another patch fixing up all the kerneldoc issues
in both files.
ChenYu
> (And below seems you indirectly agrees on that)
>
> > > > + */
>
> ...
>
> > > > +/** of_regulator_dev_lookup - lookup a regulator device with device tree only
> > >
> > > Something went wrong with the indentation.
> >
> > Will fix, and also add a "Return" section.
>
> Thank you!
>
> > > > + * @dev: Device pointer for regulator supply lookup.
> > > > + * @supply: Supply name or regulator ID.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * If successful, returns a struct regulator_dev that corresponds to the name
> > > > + * @supply and with the embedded struct device refcount incremented by one.
> > > > + * The refcount must be dropped by calling put_device().
> > > > + * On failure one of the following ERR-PTR-encoded values is returned:
> > > > + * -ENODEV if lookup fails permanently, -EPROBE_DEFER if lookup could succeed
> > > > + * in the future.
> > > > + */
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists