[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <794f15e7-e15c-a70d-1e72-b5bc570eeab9@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:58:13 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <lee@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 00/12] mfd: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped()
On 2024/8/26 16:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/08/2024 10:28, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
>>
>> Jinjie Ruan (12):
>> mfd: max77620: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped()
>> mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped()
>> mtd: rawnand: arasan: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped()
>
>
> No, you are mixing different subsystems. And even did not care to Cc
> their maintainers.
OK, I'll resend them.
>
> <form letter>
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC (and consider --no-git-fallback argument). It might
> happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated
> entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux
> kernel.
>
> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
> (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
> fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
> patches to the patchset.
> </form letter>
Sorry, the low scrip which wrap the `scripts/get_maintainer.pl` has a bug.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists