linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240826115213.389acaef@xps-13>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 11:52:13 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: <michal.simek@....com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
 <liang.yang@...ogic.com>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 <khilman@...libre.com>, <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
 <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, <heiko@...ech.de>,
 <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 <wens@...e.org>, <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, <samuel@...lland.org>,
 <kees@...nel.org>, <gustavoars@...nel.org>, <linux@...blig.org>,
 <robh@...nel.org>, <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
 <erick.archer@....com>, <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
 <val@...kett.cool>, <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>,
 <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>, <krzk@...nel.org>,
 <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use
 for_each_child_of_node_scoped()

Hi Jinjie,

ruanjinjie@...wei.com wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800:

> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.

Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration?

Thanks,
Miquèl