linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7430f87-88d2-4c08-bc1e-6bb3da4e332c@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:19:07 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
 Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: michal.simek@....com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
 liang.yang@...ogic.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, khilman@...libre.com,
 jbrunet@...libre.com, martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com,
 matthias.bgg@...il.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
 heiko@...ech.de, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
 wens@...e.org, jernej.skrabec@...il.com, samuel@...lland.org,
 kees@...nel.org, gustavoars@...nel.org, linux@...blig.org, robh@...nel.org,
 u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, erick.archer@....com,
 christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr, val@...kett.cool,
 christophe.kerello@...s.st.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use
 for_each_child_of_node_scoped()

On 26/08/2024 11:52, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Jinjie,
> 
> ruanjinjie@...wei.com wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800:
> 
>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
> 
> Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration?

You were not cc-ed on previous iteration. I asked for proper split
between subsystems and sending to maintainers, thus this resend.

Although for such big patchset, I would expect some waiting time, not
sending immediately.

Best regards,
Krzysztof