linux-kernel - [PATCH 03/12] wifi: mwifiex: deduplicate code in mwifiex_cmd_tx_rate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240826-mwifiex-cleanup-1-v1-3-56e6f8e056ec@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:01:24 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>, 
 Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] wifi: mwifiex: deduplicate code in
 mwifiex_cmd_tx_rate_cfg()

The code block inside the if/else is the same with just using
pbitmap_rates if non NULL or priv->bitmap_rates otherwise. Deduplicate
the code by picking the correct pointer first and then using it
unconditionally.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmd.c | 43 +++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmd.c
index e2800a831c8ed..30dd4e58e2b1d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmd.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ mwifiex_cmd_802_11_get_log(struct host_cmd_ds_command *cmd)
  */
 static int mwifiex_cmd_tx_rate_cfg(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
 				   struct host_cmd_ds_command *cmd,
-				   u16 cmd_action, u16 *pbitmap_rates)
+				   u16 cmd_action, const u16 *pbitmap_rates)
 {
 	struct host_cmd_ds_tx_rate_cfg *rate_cfg = &cmd->params.tx_rate_cfg;
 	struct mwifiex_rate_scope *rate_scope;
@@ -174,34 +174,19 @@ static int mwifiex_cmd_tx_rate_cfg(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
 	rate_scope->type = cpu_to_le16(TLV_TYPE_RATE_SCOPE);
 	rate_scope->length = cpu_to_le16
 		(sizeof(*rate_scope) - sizeof(struct mwifiex_ie_types_header));
-	if (pbitmap_rates != NULL) {
-		rate_scope->hr_dsss_rate_bitmap = cpu_to_le16(pbitmap_rates[0]);
-		rate_scope->ofdm_rate_bitmap = cpu_to_le16(pbitmap_rates[1]);
-		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rate_scope->ht_mcs_rate_bitmap); i++)
-			rate_scope->ht_mcs_rate_bitmap[i] =
-				cpu_to_le16(pbitmap_rates[2 + i]);
-		if (priv->adapter->fw_api_ver == MWIFIEX_FW_V15) {
-			for (i = 0;
-			     i < ARRAY_SIZE(rate_scope->vht_mcs_rate_bitmap);
-			     i++)
-				rate_scope->vht_mcs_rate_bitmap[i] =
-					cpu_to_le16(pbitmap_rates[10 + i]);
-		}
-	} else {
-		rate_scope->hr_dsss_rate_bitmap =
-			cpu_to_le16(priv->bitmap_rates[0]);
-		rate_scope->ofdm_rate_bitmap =
-			cpu_to_le16(priv->bitmap_rates[1]);
-		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rate_scope->ht_mcs_rate_bitmap); i++)
-			rate_scope->ht_mcs_rate_bitmap[i] =
-				cpu_to_le16(priv->bitmap_rates[2 + i]);
-		if (priv->adapter->fw_api_ver == MWIFIEX_FW_V15) {
-			for (i = 0;
-			     i < ARRAY_SIZE(rate_scope->vht_mcs_rate_bitmap);
-			     i++)
-				rate_scope->vht_mcs_rate_bitmap[i] =
-					cpu_to_le16(priv->bitmap_rates[10 + i]);
-		}
+	if (!pbitmap_rates)
+		pbitmap_rates = priv->bitmap_rates;
+
+	rate_scope->hr_dsss_rate_bitmap = cpu_to_le16(pbitmap_rates[0]);
+	rate_scope->ofdm_rate_bitmap = cpu_to_le16(pbitmap_rates[1]);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rate_scope->ht_mcs_rate_bitmap); i++)
+		rate_scope->ht_mcs_rate_bitmap[i] = cpu_to_le16(pbitmap_rates[2 + i]);
+
+	if (priv->adapter->fw_api_ver == MWIFIEX_FW_V15) {
+		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rate_scope->vht_mcs_rate_bitmap); i++)
+			rate_scope->vht_mcs_rate_bitmap[i] =
+				cpu_to_le16(pbitmap_rates[10 + i]);
 	}
 
 	rate_drop = (struct mwifiex_rate_drop_pattern *) ((u8 *) rate_scope +

-- 
2.39.2