lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <992d6ff9-3181-4a71-9e21-3ba6465693d6@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:31:18 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Bao Cheng Su <baocheng.su@...mens.com>,
 Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: soc: ti: am645-system-controller: add
 child nodes used by main domain

On 24.08.24 19:58, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 18:37-20240814, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>>
>> Expand bindings to cover both the MCU and the main usage of the AM654
>> system controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>> ---
>>  .../soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml    | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
>> index e79803e586ca..cb9da3ec39a8 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
> 
> As per linux-next, this file does not exist? looks like you might need
> to rebase on latest next?
> 

"This goes on top of
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/cover/20240518-dt-bindings-ti-soc-mfd-v1-0-b3952f104c9a@linaro.org/"

Is that series obsolete by now?

Jan

>> @@ -29,11 +29,30 @@ properties:
>>  
>>    ranges: true
>>  
>> +  dss-oldi-io-ctrl@...0:
>> +    type: object
>> +    $ref: /schemas/mfd/syscon.yaml#
>> +    properties:
>> +      compatible:
>> +        items:
>> +          - const: ti,am654-dss-oldi-io-ctrl
>> +          - const: syscon
>> +
>> +  clock-controller@...0:
>> +    type: object
>> +    $ref: /schemas/clock/ti,am654-ehrpwm-tbclk.yaml#
>> +    description:
>> +      Clock provider for TI EHRPWM nodes.
>> +
>>  patternProperties:
>>    "^phy@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>      type: object
>>      $ref: /schemas/phy/ti,phy-gmii-sel.yaml#
>>  
>> +  "^clock@[0-9a-f]+$":
>> +    type: object
>> +    $ref: /schemas/soc/ti/ti,am654-serdes-ctrl.yaml#
>> +
>>  required:
>>    - compatible
>>    - reg
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>
> 

-- 
Siemens AG, Technology
Linux Expert Center


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ