[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFoZBXGKf_TMGFUCL8pHw-=5GrK12KQvnPs9vhhwVkAGuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:38:37 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
Shyam Saini <shyamsaini@...ux.microsoft.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Manuel Traut <manut@...ka.net>,
Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) subsystem
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 at 09:38, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 7:18 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:23:03PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 17:36, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This patch set is getting ready to be queued for the next merge window. The
> > > > issues reported by Mikka in the v7 patch set has been resolved, the issues
> > > > turned out to be outside of the v7 patch set relating to configuration in
> > > > the secure world. I'm planning a pull request to arm-soc, but before that
> > > > I'd rather have acks or at least an OK for:
> > > > - "rpmb: add Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) subsystem" by Greg
> > > > - "mmc: block: register RPMB partition with the RPMB subsystem" by Ulf
> > > >
> > > > Arnd, please let me know if anything else is missing.
> > >
> > > Greg, Jens,
> > >
> > > To help out with the merging strategy, I don't mind queuing this whole
> > > series via my mmc tree. It would also be nice to let it cook in
> > > linux-next for while, via my next branch.
> > >
> > > From my point of view this looks good to me now, but please let me
> > > know if you prefer a different route or if you have any further
> > > comments.
> >
> > No objection from me, please take it through your tree, makes it simpler
> > for me :)
>
> Same here, Ulf please take it through your tree.
>
> Thanks for helping and reviewing this.
>
> Cheers,
> Jens
The series applied for next, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists