lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202408262035.4BysJ5CK-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:57:58 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay <devnull+xianwei.zhao.amlogic.com@...nel.org>,
	Yiting Deng <yiting.deng@...ogic.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rtc: support for the Amlogic on-chip RTC

Hi Xianwei,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on dff71e5c6076314f3eefe700abd6af834c57bd64]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Xianwei-Zhao-via-B4-Relay/dt-bindings-rtc-Add-Amlogic-A311L2-and-A113X2-rtc/20240826-125504
base:   dff71e5c6076314f3eefe700abd6af834c57bd64
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240823-rtc-v1-2-6f70381da283%40amlogic.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/3] rtc: support for the Amlogic on-chip RTC
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20240826 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240826/202408262035.4BysJ5CK-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240826/202408262035.4BysJ5CK-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408262035.4BysJ5CK-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/rtc/rtc-amlogic.c:159:6: warning: variable 'alarm_sec' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
     159 |         if (alarm->enabled) {
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/rtc/rtc-amlogic.c:173:19: note: uninitialized use occurs here
     173 |                 alarm->enabled, alarm_sec);
         |                                 ^~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/dev_printk.h:168:46: note: expanded from macro 'dev_dbg'
     168 |         dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
         |                                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/dev_printk.h:129:34: note: expanded from macro 'dev_printk'
     129 |                 _dev_printk(level, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);            \
         |                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/rtc/rtc-amlogic.c:159:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
     159 |         if (alarm->enabled) {
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/rtc/rtc-amlogic.c:157:20: note: initialize the variable 'alarm_sec' to silence this warning
     157 |         time64_t alarm_sec;
         |                           ^
         |                            = 0
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-amlogic.c:565:34: warning: unused variable 'aml_rtc_device_id' [-Wunused-const-variable]
     565 | static const struct of_device_id aml_rtc_device_id[] = {
         |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   2 warnings generated.


vim +159 drivers/rtc/rtc-amlogic.c

   153	
   154	static int aml_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
   155	{
   156		struct aml_rtc_data *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
   157		time64_t alarm_sec;
   158	
 > 159		if (alarm->enabled) {
   160			regmap_update_bits(rtc->map, RTC_CTRL,
   161					   RTC_ALRM0_EN, RTC_ALRM0_EN);
   162			regmap_update_bits(rtc->map, RTC_INT_MASK,
   163					   RTC_ALRM0_IRQ_MSK, 0);
   164	
   165			alarm_sec = rtc_tm_to_time64(&alarm->time);
   166			if (alarm_sec > U32_MAX) {
   167				dev_err(dev, "alarm value invalid!\n");
   168				return -EINVAL;
   169			}
   170			aml_set_alarm(rtc, alarm_sec);
   171		}
   172		dev_dbg(dev, "%s: alarm->enabled=%d alarm_set=%llds\n", __func__,
   173			alarm->enabled, alarm_sec);
   174	
   175		return 0;
   176	}
   177	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ