[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zs3kRrRW9rrfbSDP@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:35:50 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] regulator: core: Fix
regulator_is_supported_voltage() kerneldoc return value
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 05:55:42PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The kerneldoc for regulator_is_supported_voltage() states that the
> return value is a boolean. That is not correct, as it could return an
> error number if the check failed.
I don't know what error number means. Is it positive? Negative?
s/error number/negative error code/g
(Here and everywhere else)
> Fix the description by expanding it to cover the true, false and error
true and false are not what is returned, right?
> conditions. The description is also converted to a proper "Return"
> section.
...
> - * Returns a boolean.
> + * Return: 1 if voltage range is support, 0 if not, or error number if
supported
> + * voltage can't be changed and voltage readback failed.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists