| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Zs30P9EThSvLLZg5@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 21:13:59 +0530
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in
amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 04:13:55PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>
> AMD systems that support preferred cores will use "166" as their
> numerator for max frequency calculations instead of "255".
>
> Add a function for detecting preferred cores by looking at the
> highest perf value on all cores.
>
> If preferred cores are enabled return 166 and if disabled the
> value in the highest perf register. As the function will be called
> multiple times, cache the values for the boost numerator and if
> preferred cores will be enabled in global variables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> ---
[..snip..]
> /**
> * amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator: Get the numerator to use for boost ratio calculation
> * @cpu: CPU to get numerator for.
> @@ -162,20 +232,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_highest_perf);
> */
> int amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator)
> {
> - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
> + bool prefcore;
> + int ret;
>
> - if (c->x86 == 0x17 && ((c->x86_model >= 0x30 && c->x86_model < 0x40) ||
> - (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model < 0x80))) {
> - *numerator = 166;
> - return 0;
> - }
> + ret = amd_detect_prefcore(&prefcore);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> - if (c->x86 == 0x19 && ((c->x86_model >= 0x20 && c->x86_model < 0x30) ||
> - (c->x86_model >= 0x40 && c->x86_model < 0x70))) {
> - *numerator = 166;
> + /* without preferred cores, return the highest perf register value */
> + if (!prefcore) {
> + *numerator = boost_numerator;
> return 0;
> }
> - *numerator = 255;
> + *numerator = CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PREFCORE;
Interesting. So even when the user boots a system that supports
preferred-cores with "amd_preferred=disable",
amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator() will return CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PREFCORE
as the call prefcore == true here.
I suppose that is as intended, since even though the user may not want
to use the preferred core logic for task-scheduling/load-balancing,
the numerator for the boost-ratio is purely dependent on the h/w
capability.
Is this understanding correct? If so, can this be included as a
comment in the code ?
The rest of the patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@....com>
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index f470b5700db58..ec32c830abc1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -807,32 +807,18 @@ static DECLARE_WORK(sched_prefcore_work, amd_pstste_sched_prefcore_workfn);
>
> static void amd_pstate_init_prefcore(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> {
> - int ret, prio;
> - u32 highest_perf;
> -
> - ret = amd_get_highest_perf(cpudata->cpu, &highest_perf);
> - if (ret)
> + /* user disabled or not detected */
> + if (!amd_pstate_prefcore)
> return;
>
> cpudata->hw_prefcore = true;
> - /* check if CPPC preferred core feature is enabled*/
> - if (highest_perf < CPPC_MAX_PERF)
> - prio = (int)highest_perf;
> - else {
> - pr_debug("AMD CPPC preferred core is unsupported!\n");
> - cpudata->hw_prefcore = false;
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (!amd_pstate_prefcore)
> - return;
>
> /*
> * The priorities can be set regardless of whether or not
> * sched_set_itmt_support(true) has been called and it is valid to
> * update them at any time after it has been called.
> */
> - sched_set_itmt_core_prio(prio, cpudata->cpu);
> + sched_set_itmt_core_prio((int)READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf), cpudata->cpu);
>
> schedule_work(&sched_prefcore_work);
> }
> @@ -998,12 +984,12 @@ static int amd_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> cpudata->cpu = policy->cpu;
>
> - amd_pstate_init_prefcore(cpudata);
> -
> ret = amd_pstate_init_perf(cpudata);
> if (ret)
> goto free_cpudata1;
>
> + amd_pstate_init_prefcore(cpudata);
> +
> ret = amd_pstate_init_freq(cpudata);
> if (ret)
> goto free_cpudata1;
> @@ -1453,12 +1439,12 @@ static int amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> cpudata->cpu = policy->cpu;
> cpudata->epp_policy = 0;
>
> - amd_pstate_init_prefcore(cpudata);
> -
> ret = amd_pstate_init_perf(cpudata);
> if (ret)
> goto free_cpudata1;
>
> + amd_pstate_init_prefcore(cpudata);
> +
> ret = amd_pstate_init_freq(cpudata);
> if (ret)
> goto free_cpudata1;
> @@ -1903,6 +1889,12 @@ static int __init amd_pstate_init(void)
> static_call_update(amd_pstate_update_perf, cppc_update_perf);
> }
>
> + if (amd_pstate_prefcore) {
> + ret = amd_detect_prefcore(&amd_pstate_prefcore);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> /* enable amd pstate feature */
> ret = amd_pstate_enable(true);
> if (ret) {
> diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> index 2246ce0630362..1d79320a23490 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> @@ -137,10 +137,12 @@ struct cppc_cpudata {
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD
> +extern int amd_detect_prefcore(bool *detected);
> extern int amd_get_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu, u32 *highest_perf);
> extern int amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator);
> #else /* !CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD */
> static inline int amd_get_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu, u32 *highest_perf) { return -ENODEV; }
> +static inline int amd_detect_prefcore(bool *detected) { return -ENODEV; }
> static inline int amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator) { return -ENODEV; }
> #endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD */
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists