| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Zs4SovPgLmlrVOJr@google.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:53:38 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: tegra: Use of_property_read_variable_u32_array()
and of_property_present()
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 08:36:29AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 04:23:48PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 02:14:01PM GMT, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > > There's no need to get the length of an DT array property before
> > > parsing the array. of_property_read_variable_u32_array() takes a
> > > minimum and maximum length and returns the actual length (or error
> > > code).
> > >
> > > This is part of a larger effort to remove callers of of_get_property()
> > > and similar functions. of_get_property() leaks the DT property data
> > > pointer which is a problem for dynamically allocated nodes which may
> > > be freed.
> > > ---
> > > drivers/input/keyboard/tegra-kbc.c | 72 +++++++++++-------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/tegra-kbc.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/tegra-kbc.c
> > > index a1765ed8c825..53f39fc155ea 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/tegra-kbc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/tegra-kbc.c
> > > @@ -491,12 +491,10 @@ static int tegra_kbc_parse_dt(struct tegra_kbc *kbc)
> > > struct device_node *np = kbc->dev->of_node;
> > > u32 prop;
> > > int i;
> > > - u32 num_rows = 0;
> > > - u32 num_cols = 0;
> > > + int num_rows;
> > > + int num_cols;
> > > u32 cols_cfg[KBC_MAX_GPIO];
> > > u32 rows_cfg[KBC_MAX_GPIO];
> > > - int proplen;
> > > - int ret;
> > >
> > > if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "nvidia,debounce-delay-ms", &prop))
> > > kbc->debounce_cnt = prop;
> > > @@ -510,56 +508,23 @@ static int tegra_kbc_parse_dt(struct tegra_kbc *kbc)
> > > of_property_read_bool(np, "nvidia,wakeup-source")) /* legacy */
> > > kbc->wakeup = true;
> > >
> > > - if (!of_get_property(np, "nvidia,kbc-row-pins", &proplen)) {
> > > - dev_err(kbc->dev, "property nvidia,kbc-row-pins not found\n");
> > > - return -ENOENT;
> > > - }
> > > - num_rows = proplen / sizeof(u32);
> > > -
> > > - if (!of_get_property(np, "nvidia,kbc-col-pins", &proplen)) {
> > > - dev_err(kbc->dev, "property nvidia,kbc-col-pins not found\n");
> > > - return -ENOENT;
> > > - }
> > > - num_cols = proplen / sizeof(u32);
> > > -
> > > - if (num_rows > kbc->hw_support->max_rows) {
> > > - dev_err(kbc->dev,
> > > - "Number of rows is more than supported by hardware\n");
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if (num_cols > kbc->hw_support->max_columns) {
> > > - dev_err(kbc->dev,
> > > - "Number of cols is more than supported by hardware\n");
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if (!of_get_property(np, "linux,keymap", &proplen)) {
> > > + if (!of_property_present(np, "linux,keymap")) {
> > > dev_err(kbc->dev, "property linux,keymap not found\n");
> > > return -ENOENT;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (!num_rows || !num_cols || ((num_rows + num_cols) > KBC_MAX_GPIO)) {
> > > - dev_err(kbc->dev,
> > > - "keypad rows/columns not properly specified\n");
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > /* Set all pins as non-configured */
> > > for (i = 0; i < kbc->num_rows_and_columns; i++)
> > > kbc->pin_cfg[i].type = PIN_CFG_IGNORE;
> > >
> > > - ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "nvidia,kbc-row-pins",
> > > - rows_cfg, num_rows);
> > > - if (ret < 0) {
> > > + num_rows = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(np, "nvidia,kbc-row-pins",
> > > + rows_cfg, 1, KBC_MAX_GPIO);
> > > + if (num_rows < 0) {
> > > dev_err(kbc->dev, "Rows configurations are not proper\n");
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "nvidia,kbc-col-pins",
> > > - cols_cfg, num_cols);
> > > - if (ret < 0) {
> > > - dev_err(kbc->dev, "Cols configurations are not proper\n");
> > > + return num_rows;
> > > + } else if (num_rows > kbc->hw_support->max_rows) {
> > > + dev_err(kbc->dev,
> > > + "Number of rows is more than supported by hardware\n");
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -568,11 +533,28 @@ static int tegra_kbc_parse_dt(struct tegra_kbc *kbc)
> > > kbc->pin_cfg[rows_cfg[i]].num = i;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + num_cols = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(np, "nvidia,kbc-col-pins",
> > > + cols_cfg, 1, KBC_MAX_GPIO);
> > > + if (num_cols < 0) {
> > > + dev_err(kbc->dev, "Cols configurations are not proper\n");
> > > + return num_cols;
> > > + } else if (num_cols > kbc->hw_support->max_columns) {
> > > + dev_err(kbc->dev,
> > > + "Number of cols is more than supported by hardware\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > for (i = 0; i < num_cols; i++) {
> > > kbc->pin_cfg[cols_cfg[i]].type = PIN_CFG_COL;
> > > kbc->pin_cfg[cols_cfg[i]].num = i;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (!num_rows || !num_cols || ((num_rows + num_cols) > KBC_MAX_GPIO)) {
> > > + dev_err(kbc->dev,
> > > + "keypad rows/columns not properly specified\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> >
> > Previously we wouldn't try to initialize the columns when the
> > rows/columns were invalid, so this block could move before the last for
> > loop above.
> >
> > But it doesn't really matter given that these are exceptions and really
> > shouldn't happen, so:
> >
> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>
> I don't quite like of_property_read_variable_u32_array() because it is
> OF-specific. device_property_count_u32() will return the number of
> elements in an array. But I guess this driver will only be used on an OF
> system...
>
> Applied, thank you.
Oh, wait, can I get your SOB please?
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists