linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] nvme-pci: add NVME_QUIRK_BOGUS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53369ABE-DB4F-44B0-831C-E4CB232A949A@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 19:08:15 +0000
From: Saeed Mirzamohammadi <saeed.mirzamohammadi@...cle.com>
To: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org"
	<stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe
	<axboe@...com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "javier.gonz@...sung.com" <javier.gonz@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] nvme-pci: add NVME_QUIRK_BOGUS_NID for Samsung PM173X

Hi Pankaj/Samsung team,

Sorry for pulling up an old thread. Has this been fixed in the firmware? If not, we could fix this issue with quirk for now until it’s resolved on the firmware side.

Thanks,
Saeed


> On Apr 27, 2023, at 12:37 AM, Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Christoph,
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 07:12:59AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 02:26:04PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Can you send a patch with a new quirk that just disables the EUI64,
>>> but keeps the NGUID?
>> 
>> Did this go anywhere?
> We had a discussion about this internally with our firmware team, and it
> looks like these firmware were given to specific customers based on
> mutual agreement. They are already in discussion with our firmware team
> regarding this.
> 
> I don't think this should go into as a generic quirk in Linux for these
> models.