[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240827133550.19c9eee4@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:35:50 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob
Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor
Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Alexandre
Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, David Wu
<david.wu@...k-chips.com>, Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ethernet: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Add GMAC support for
RK3576
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 10:11:15 -0400 Detlev Casanova wrote:
> +static void rk3576_set_to_rgmii(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv,
> + int tx_delay, int rx_delay)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &bsp_priv->pdev->dev;
> + unsigned int offset_con;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf) || IS_ERR(bsp_priv->php_grf)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Missing rockchip,grf or rockchip,php-grf property\n");
> + return;
> + }
Seems like there's plenty of precedent in this file, but seems a little
strange that we just print a message and carry on, without returning an
error.
Would be better to return an error or add some info to the ops
struct, so that the caller can check if the correct (of the two)
regmaps are set
Powered by blists - more mailing lists