[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2fcf6747-9bd0-4b27-80c0-fa6246aec812@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:56:41 -0700
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Rob Clark
<robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten
<marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel
Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/12] drm/msm/dpu: move scaling limitations out of the
hw_catalog
On 6/26/2024 2:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Max upscale / downscale factors are constant between platforms. In
> preparation to adding support for virtual planes and allocating SSPP
> blocks on demand move max scaling factors out of the HW catalog and
> handle them in the dpu_plane directly. If any of the scaling blocks gets
> different limitations, this will have to be handled separately, after
> the plane refactoring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 12 ------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 4 ----
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
If we do end up with different scaling limits in the future, we will
decide on what would be the best way to handle that, but till then,
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists