[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <svraqyrvmyfvezj6zuzsoc5cy3lqklwxkmjdloquj2v4r5ik72@xnbaoigiikeu>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:25:47 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Sricharan R <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, quic_nsekar@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, robimarko@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] phy: qcom: Introduce PCIe UNIPHY 28LP driver
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:27:54AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> From: Nitheesh Sekar <quic_nsekar@...cinc.com>
>
> Add Qualcomm PCIe UNIPHY 28LP driver support present
> in Qualcomm IPQ5018 SoC and the phy init sequence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nitheesh Sekar <quic_nsekar@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
...
> +static int qcom_uniphy_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct qcom_uniphy_pcie *phy;
> + int ret;
> + struct phy *generic_phy;
> + struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
> +
> + phy = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*phy), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!phy)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, phy);
> + phy->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + phy->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + if (!phy->data)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = qcom_uniphy_pcie_get_resources(pdev, phy);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to get resources:\n");
What the hell happened here? Read my review one more time and then git
grep for usage of dev_err_probe.
NAK.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists