[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34694c88-13c5-41d8-8a3a-437b6f4fdcd9@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 15:14:26 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: shmem: fix minor off-by-one in shrinkable calculation
On 2024/8/26 06:42, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> There has been a long-standing and very minor off-by-one, where
> shmem_get_folio_gfp() decides if a large folio extends beyond i_size
> far enough to leave a page or more for freeing later under pressure.
>
> This is not something needed for stable: but it will be proportionately
> more significant as support for smaller large folios is added, and is
> best fixed before duplicating the check in other places.
>
> Fixes: 779750d20b93 ("shmem: split huge pages beyond i_size under memory pressure")
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
LGTM. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> mm/shmem.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 85e3bd3e709e..37c300f69baf 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ static int shmem_get_folio_gfp(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> alloced = true;
> if (folio_test_large(folio) &&
> DIV_ROUND_UP(i_size_read(inode), PAGE_SIZE) <
> - folio_next_index(folio) - 1) {
> + folio_next_index(folio)) {
> struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo = SHMEM_SB(inode->i_sb);
> struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
> /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists