[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4feacb1b-5b6e-4e5f-b621-78ec3cd57a01@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 09:47:28 +0800
From: chenridong <chenridong@...wei.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, <hannes@...xchg.org>, <adityakali@...gle.com>,
<sergeh@...nel.org>, <mkoutny@...e.com>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chenridong@...weicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next 09/11] cgroup/cpuset: move v1 interfaces to
cpuset-v1.c
On 2024/8/27 3:47, Waiman Long wrote:
>
> On 8/26/24 15:40, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 03:30:14PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> ...
>>> Another alternative is to include cpuset-v1.c directly into cpuset.c
>>> like
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS_V1
>>> #include "cpuset-v1.c"
>>> #else
>>> ....
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> Then you don't need to change the names and will not need
>>> cpuset-internal.h.
>>> It is up to you to decide what you want to do.
>> FWIW, I'd prefer to have cpuset1_ prefixed functions declared in
>> cpuset1.h
>> or something rather than including .c file.
>
> Sure. Let's have "cpuset1_" prefix if it is v1 specific and "cpuset_"
> prefix if it is used by both v1 and v2. That applies only to newly
> exposed names.
>
> Cheers,
> Longman
>
I will rename the functions with cpuset1_/cpuset_ prefix.
Thanks,
Ridong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists