[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zs2IVIQwZ-8fQGZ4@zx2c4.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:03:32 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] random: vDSO: don't use 64 bits atomics on 32 bits
architectures
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 09:31:50AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Performing SMP atomic operations on u64 fails on powerpc32:
Thanks for this, and nice catch on the vDSO side checking on big endian.
I've applied this, fixing up the commit message and the comment,
maintaining the reverse christmas tree in getrandom.c, and adding tglx's
suggested-by tag.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists