[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9f2ae40-7c13-4d43-b97e-fe011688a14a@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 09:40:53 +0100
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Li Wang <liwang@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, ltp@...ts.linux.it
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Damien Le Moal
<dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCh v2] loop: Increase bsize variable from unsigned short to
unsigned int
On 27/08/2024 09:17, Li Wang wrote:
> This change allows the loopback driver to handle block size larger than
> PAGE_SIZE and increases the consistency of data types used within the driver.
> Especially to match the struct queue_limits.logical_block_size type.
>
> Also, this is to get rid of the LTP/ioctl_loop06 test failure:
>
> 12 ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE with arg > PAGE_SIZE
> 13 ioctl_loop06.c:59: TFAIL: Set block size succeed unexpectedly
> ...
> 18 ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_CONFIGURE with block_size > PAGE_SIZE
> 19 ioctl_loop06.c:59: TFAIL: Set block size succeed unexpectedly
>
> Thoese fail due to the loop_reconfigure_limits() cast bsize to 'unsined short'
these
> that never gets an expected error when testing invalid logical block size,
> which was just exposed since 6.11-rc1 introduced patches:
>
> commit 9423c653fe61 ("loop: Don't bother validating blocksize")
> commit fe3d508ba95b ("block: Validate logical block size in blk_validate_limits()")
Maybe it's better to add a fixes tag for original commit which
introduced unsigned short usage.
>
> Link:https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2024-
> August/039912.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!
> MxW7Cvs_YKyihvENQFEGgHt-1KbCFD9gkUJxwI8gguQlawan3UNneBoB_THVG4zNP8Sao2a0apcOu03lcg$
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang<liwang@...hat.com>
> Cc: John Garry<john.g.garry@...cle.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe<axboe@...nel.dk>
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi<stefanha@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal<dlemoal@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Stancek<jstancek@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists