[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <473fe1f7-33c5-43ca-94c6-b874a1a60f59@stanley.mountain>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 12:40:08 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Riyan Dhiman <riyandhiman14@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vme_user: added bound check to geoid
You need to put v2 (v3 now) into the subject.
https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2022/07/27/how-to-send-a-v2-patch/
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 02:39:55PM +0530, Riyan Dhiman wrote:
> Added bound check for geoid in probe function because geoid will
> always be positive and less than VME_MAX_SLOT
Add a period to the end of the sentence.
But also add that "The geoid variable is a module parameter which lets people
hard code the slot number." It's important to mention that it's a module
parameter so people know that it's root only. Maybe mention that explicitly.
"The geoid variable is a module parameter so it can only be controlled by the
root user. Only values between 0 and VME_MAX_SLOT make sense. Invalid values
don't seem to cause a serious issue except for perhaps some weird error codes."
>
> Signed-off-by: Riyan Dhiman <riyandhiman14@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_fake.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_tsi148.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_fake.c b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_fake.c
> index 7f84d1c86f29..d8f4ba29da0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_fake.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_fake.c
> @@ -1059,6 +1059,13 @@ static int __init fake_init(void)
> struct vme_slave_resource *slave_image;
> struct vme_lm_resource *lm;
>
> + /* If geoid provided, validate it is positive and less than VME_MAX_SLOTS */
This comment is obvoius. Just leave it out.
regards,
dan carpener
Powered by blists - more mailing lists